Tag Archives: water contamination

Researchers find contamination in Canadian oilsands operation, but aren’t allowed to talk about it

Researchers from Environment Canada (EC) and the University of Alberta have published a study in which they showed contaminants accumulated in the snow near oilsands operations, despite what oil companies are claiming. They also discovered contaminants in precipitation from testing in the region.

University of Alberta scientist David Schindler holds a whitefish with a tumour, collected from the Athabasca watershed.

 

Perhaps even more disturbing is that fact that researchers were discouraged to talk about their results, according to an internal federal document. This was first obvious at a November 2011 conference in Boston, where the results were first published.

“EC’s research conducted during winter 2010-11 confirms results already published by the University of Alberta that show contaminants in snow in the oilsands area,” said a background document about Environment Canada’s latest findings. “If scientists are approached for interviews at the conference, the EC communications policy will be followed by referring the journalist to the media relations … phone number. An appropriate spokesperson will then be identified depending on journalist questions.”

The original study, led by University of Alberta scientists Erin Kelly and David Schindler, analyzed winter snow, and found a direct correlation between contamination and oilsands operations proximity: the highest concentrations were found right next to the field, with levels dropping further away. However, according to the leaked document, which was also in the hands of Environment Minister Peter Kent, instead of the real results, a scripted list of answers was “suggested”, one which claimed that no link was established between levels of contaminants found and any effect on fish.

The document also said that Environment Canada scientist Derek Muir, who was slated to attend the conference in Boston, and another senior department official, Dan Wicklum, would be allowed to answer questions from reporters “if approved by media relations.” The situation is still pretty murky, but the fact that Wicklum took a leave of absence from his senior government position last January to accept a new job as chief executive of a new oil and gas company seems pretty suggestive.

This is quite a dreadful and shameful situation, and one which should never happen in any country – let alone in developed countries such as Canada. There really isn’t a lot of information related to this cover-up, and the one that can be found is often contradictory, so I won’t go any further. I was outraged by this situation, and as soon as I found something else on this matter I’ll be sure to write it down.

Main Source 

coal ash

New toxic coal ash pollutant sites listed by environmental group

coal ash The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, in collaboration with the  independent Environmental Integrity Project, have identified 20 new sites in the US contaminated with toxic coal ash, raising the number to a current total of 157 sites nationwide, whose water supplies and soil ares contaminated.

Coal ash is the waste which results from coal combustion, filled with arsenic, selenium, lead, cadmium and mercury, all of these heavy metals are toxic for the soil, local fauna and man from a certain level. Typically, this waste has to be disposed of properly in ponds with liners and covers, however these new discovered sites have all been dumped directly in complete disregard.

In 19 out of 20 sites, arsenic and other toxic metals water contamination has reached levels far exceeding the allowed limit impossed by the Safe Drinking Water Act. The 20th site showed contaminated soil with arsenic 900 times the federal screening level for site cleanups.

Those involved in coal ash clean-ups have only common sense and a deep respect for nature to guide them along, since most US states don’t have a clear policy, neither requiring any construction standards or  monitoring, nor cleanup requirements. It’s very nice to hear certain states put so much faith in their local industries’ civil ethics, however like most of the time when there aren’t any laws, complemented with criminal charges against its offenders, people will always take the easier, cheaper way. Maybe this is why half of the US’s coal ash is dumped in an uncontrolled, highly pollutant manner, according to the released report.

The pollution report coincides as the EPA is struggling to decide whether to regulate the ash as a hazardous material. You might wonder why this kind of extremely evident environmental hazard hasn’t been regulated until now. Well, it seems there are many interests at stake, as a number of congressmen, whose political affiliations I’d like to chose not to disclose (we’re an apolitical publication),  are trying to block the stricter regulation from happening.

reuters  | image credit