ocean carbon cycle

Oceans soak less carbon due to global warming

Since the mid-XIXth century average global temperatures have risen by ~0.8 degrees Centigrade, yet this figure would have been much higher were it not for the world’s oceans ability to soak up most of the heat trapped by greenhouse gases. The IPCC estimates that some 90% of the heat trapped by CO2 and methane since the 1970s has been absorbed by the world’s oceans and converted into organic carbon, sinking to the floor where it stays trapped for hundreds of years. However, the carbon sinking waters aren’t going to save us forever. A new study published by researchers at University of Southampton found that less organic compounds are transported because the waters are warmer. As the oceans warm even further because of man-made global warming their ability to soak carbon diminishes further, thus creating a feedback loop.

An overused sponge

ocean carbon cycle

The ocean carbon cycle. Credit: Grid Arendal

Its not the water itself that soaks the carbon, but the tiny marine creatures known as phytoplankton which use it along with sunlight captured from the surface to photosynthesize, just like plants do. Through this process, the carbon dioxide is transformed into organic carbon compounds that rest in the phytoplankton. Through sinking particulate matter, largely from zooplankton feces and aggregates of algae, the organic carbon from the upper part of the ocean is transferred into the deeper layers below. This process is called a “biological pump”.

The color of ocean waters is an indicator of the type of phytoplankton biomass and its composition. For example – green ocean water means the particular area probably contains a lot of phytoplankton. Blue water could mean that portion of the ocean has less phytoplankton. This insight is used to make large scale assessments of biological pump efficiency using satellite imagery, even on a global level.

The UK researchers, however, used a more refined method to gauge the biological pump. Sediment traps called Pelagra were employed, which  consist of a funnel or cylinder that is held vertically in the water, with the top end open to catch material sinking through the water column and a sample cup connected to the bottom end to store the material for analysis, according to Dr Chris Marsay, who led the study. These are much better than traditional traps because they can be used to collect samples from variable depths, not just the ocean surface or floor.

Several traps were placed at various depths up to 700 meters below the Atlantic Ocean’s surface. These samples were combined with results obtained by a similar study made earlier in the Pacific.

The ratio of sinking carbon to dissolved carbon, plotted against temperature. The circles and triangles show results from the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans (respectively) and are labelled with the name given to each measurement site. The equation of the trend line is given in the top right-hand corner, along with the correlation coefficient (r2) and p-value (which shows the relationship is statistically significant). Source: Marsay et al.


Where the water was warmer, the amount of collected organic carbon was lower. This suggests that in warmer waters, phytoplankton and other organisms are more likely to dissolve in the upper ocean before they sink. When this happens, the carbon is then re-emitted back into the atmosphere, compromising the carbon sink as relayed in a paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“This would potentially result in reduced storage of carbon dioxide by the oceans, effectively acting as a positive feedback mechanism, with less atmospheric carbon dioxide being removed by the oceans,” Marsay says.

This isn’t the first study to show that ocean carbon sinks are less potent. A study published in Nature in 2009 was the first to quantify the perceived trend that oceans are becoming less efficient carbon sinks. The findings showed that oceans have absorbed a smaller proportion of fossil-fuel emissions, nearly 10 percent less, since 2000.

via Carbon Brief

One thought on “Oceans soak less carbon due to global warming

  1. odin2

    There is no empirical evidence that CO2 emissions are a significant cause of atmospheric global warming. The theory that catastrophic global warming is caused by CO2 emissions is based on an unproven theory and computers which overemphasize CO2’s role in climate change and de-emphasize the role of clouds, solar cycles, ocean cycles and other natural causes of climate change. These computers have been notoriously wrong almost all of the time (when compared to real world data) and have been compared to a sports team that played the entire season without winning a game. Computers that model an imaginary planet and are programmed with guesses of a few of the many variables affecting climate are not data or empirical evidnce.

    During the last ice age CO2 levels fell to 180 ppm and plants started to shut down. If CO2 levels had reached 150 ppm or lower, plants would have died off and all plant and animal life on the planet would have died. We currently have global CO2 levels at just under 400 ppm. Green houses regularly keep CO2 concentrations at 1000-1200 ppm because the plants grow better. In the past, CO2 levels have been at several thousand parts per million and plants and animals thrived. US submarines try to keep CO2 levels below 8,000 ppm. Federal OSHA standards set CO2 maximums at 5,000 ppm. We are much closer to being CO2 deprived than we are being threatened by too much atmospheric CO2. Plants thrive on more CO2- that is a good thing. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a colorless and odorless gas that comprises only .04% of the atmosphere. The most predominant greenhouse gas is water vapor.

    The world has not experienced atmospheric global warming in the past 18 years despite increasing CO2 emissions during this period. If CO2 was a direct and significant cause of global warming, we would have experienced global warming during the 18 year pause. We did not.

    Climate change is natural and has been occurring since the formation of the planet. The 18 year pause just proves that the skeptics were right all along-natural causes of climate change are more powerful than the insubstantial effects that human generated CO2 has on the world’s climate. The hysterics’ alarms over CO2 causing catastrophic global warming have been described accurately as the flea wagging the dog.

    Proof positive that CAGW is about power, politics and greed is the fact that every time the facts change, the CAGW cult moves the goal posts . They have at least 65 excuses for the more than 18 year pause in global warming and the failure of the CAGW climate models. The CAGW cult blames any unusual (but normal) climate event on global warming with no scientific proof. This is often done with a scary picture or one that pulls on the heart strings, and the text of the article will say “could be caused”, “is consistent with”, or “may be caused by” global warming. This is code for we have no scientific evidence but we want to scare you so we can tax CO2 and promote our political agenda.

    The real Deniers are the CAGW believers who deny the scientific studies showing that CO2’s role in global warming is not substantial and that nature (clouds, solar cycles, ocean cycles, and other natural causes) controls climate change. The CAGW believers deny nature. Ironic isn’t it that so many who worship Gaia deny nature?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *