Study unexpectedly supports the science behind global warming

The Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project was launched by physics professor Richard Muller, a long time critic of studies led by the government regarding global warming. So he and a team of physicists and statisticians set out to challenge the general consensus on global warming, and prove that skeptics have good reasons to doubt. But Muller shocked absolutely everyone at a congressional meeting when he said that the trends suggested by most previous studies are… excellent !

“We see a global warming trend that is very similar to that previously reported by the other groups.”.

Richard A. Muller

After this, everybody’s jaw dropped. Muller said that he and his group were absolutely stunned when they drew conclusions from the data they analyzed, but also stresses that so far only 2% of the study has been finished. Even so, the trends are extremely suggestive. But perhaps even more interesting and fascinating than the study is the way he presented it: he set out to prove that the general consensus on global warming is wrong, and he found out that it’s not; without any resent, he presented his results to the world, showing an attitude that honors science and scientists.

Even though conservative critics who believed Muller’s group will show that global warming are dissapointed, the conclusions are clear; the magnitude of global warming is no longer a matter of debate, and things get clearer and clearer with each passing year. Hopefully, by the time we understand this, there will still be something left to do.

9 thoughts on “Study unexpectedly supports the science behind global warming

  1. John Dodds

    NO one ever said the temperature data was perfect. All Muller did was show that it was better than expected. This does NOT show that global warming is caused by CO2. Every day we have an experiment that shows that when it cools evrry night, it gets colder, even tho we are adding more CO2. Thiss proves the global warming science is WRONG, but the measured temp data is good.

  2. mememine

    The response from the thousands of consensus climate change scientists to Obama not even mentioning the climate crisis in his State of the Union Address was utter silence. And their silence was on display when Republicans cut off American funding to their central research body, the UN’s IPCC.
    Now there is serious talk of the tea party Republicans charging those in Academia and leading news editors with TREASON for leading us to another Bush-like false war based on false evidence.
    If Climate Change were a real emergency and scientific consensus was real, the scientists would be acting like it, not cashing the remaining grant checks. The scientists if the emergency were real would be all over the media in person, warning us of the urgency of CO2 mitigation action.
    Now the media makes up it’s own climate change stories in place of the silence from the mysterious army of consensus scientists.
    And don’t forget that scientists also produced cruise missiles, cancer causing chemicals, land mine technology, nuclear weapons, germ warfare, cluster bombs, strip mining technology, Y2K, Y2Kyoto, deep sea drilling technology and now climate control. Scientific consensus was not real and these mystery saints of goodness were not saints. It was all a media illusion. Scientists made environmental protection necessary in the first place when they supposedly polluted the planet with their chemicals and cancer causing pesticides. How ironic is that, considering we bowed like fools to our Gods of science for 25 years of “unstoppable warming”.
    To condemn billions of children to a CO2 death just to get them to turn the lights out more often was unforgivable and history is watching.

  3. mjonesx

    Please read Dr. James Hansen STORMS OF MY GRANDCHILDREN and Dr. Peter Ward’s UNDER A GREEN SKY, which will give a good account of Global Warming Science.
    Dr. James Hansen has just been award the 2011 recipient of the Klopsteg Memorial Award from the American Association of Physics Teachers, one of many to be given to this scientist.

  4. Titanium_teddy

    2% of ths study completed, STOP THE PRESSES!!!

    Why bother wasting time and money, lets can the experiment here, we have the answer we want.

  5. cawmentor

    Wow that is a big dumptruck full of money!
    Yes I sure do have some findings that would allow you to finance my work further. 2% blah, looks decided to me.

  6. Danpangburn

    The way to give credibility to a false conclusion is to include some truth. What they did was analyze the same temperature data that others had (well, OK, 2% of it) and produced about the same anomaly trajectory. (That would be the truth part). The ‘scientific consensus on global warming’, which is that human activity caused global warming, was not challenged.

    The on-going temperature down trend and atmospheric carbon dioxide uptrend will do that.

  7. Pingback: Carbon Credit Business

  8. Diogenes

    So what might the cause of global warming be? Just maybe, whatever it is that has been causing global warming for the last 10,000 years, since the end of the last Ice Age. What might that be? Haven’t a clue, but I don’t think it was due to carbon dioxide emissions from all those Stone Age power plants, factories and Hummers our ancestors were enjoying while chipping arrowheads out of bits of flint. And therein lies the rub, I think: Whatever it is, it just might be something the proponents of ever bigger government can’t control or tax, so somehow nobody wants to look for it…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *